Decision details

RR/2018/2616/P and 2617/L - Northiam - Clench Green, Beales Lane

Decision Maker: Planning Committee

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: No

Is subject to call in?: No

Decisions:

DECISION: (RR/2019/2616/P) REFUSE (FULL PLANNING)

 

REASON FOR REFUSAL:

 

1.     Having regard to Section 66(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, it is considered that the proposed extension, by reason of its uncharacteristic roof form, height, footprint, wall to window proportions and projection beyond the host building’s gable end, would appear as an incongruous and discordant feature on this well preserved Grade II listed building. As such, the works proposed would fail to preserve the special architectural or historic interest of the Grade II listed building. Additionally, the works proposed would harm the building’s significance as a designated heritage asset, in conflict with paragraph 193 of the National Planning Policy Framework, and would also conflict with Policy EN2(iii) of the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy 2014 and saved Policy HG8 of the Rother District Local Plan 2006, which seek to protect the character and appearance of existing buildings.

 

NOTE:

 

1.     This refusal of planning permission relates to the following drawings:

Drawing No. 5936/LBP/A (LOCATION BLOCK PLAN), dated JUN 19

Drawing No. 5936/2 (JOINERY DETAILS), dated SEPTEMBER 2018

Drawing No. 5936/19/1/E (PROPOSED EXTENSION & INTERNAL ALTERATIONS), dated APR 19

Drawing No. 5936/19/2/A (PROPOSED INTERNAL ALTERATIONS), dated APR 19

REF. HP 06/16 (CRITTALL HOMELIGHT PLUS WINDOW FRAME PROFILES)

 

NATIONAL PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK: In accordance with the requirements of the Framework (paragraph 38) and with the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015, the Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in determining this application by identifying matters of concern with the proposal, clearly setting out the reason for refusal, thereby allowing the Applicant the opportunity to consider the harm caused and whether or not it can be remedied as part of a revised scheme.

 

DECISION: (RR/2019/2617/L) REFUSE (LISTED BUILDING CONSENT)

 

REASON FOR REFUSAL:

 

1.     Having regard to Section 16(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, it is considered that the proposed extension, by reason of its uncharacteristic roof form, height, footprint, wall to window proportions and projection beyond the host building’s gable end, would appear as an incongruous and discordant feature on this well preserved Grade II listed building. As such, the works proposed would fail to preserve the special architectural or historic interest of the Grade II listed building. Additionally, the works proposed would harm the building’s significance as a designated heritage asset, in conflict with paragraph 193 of the National Planning Policy Framework, and would also conflict with Policy EN2(iii) of the Rother Local Plan Core Strategy 2014 & saved Policy HG8 of the Rother District Local Plan 2006, which seek to protect the character and appearance of existing buildings.

 

NOTE:

 

1.     This refusal of listed building consent relates to the following drawings:

Drawing No. 5936/LBP/A (LOCATION BLOCK PLAN), dated JUN 19.

Drawing No. 5936/2 (JOINERY DETAILS), dated SEPTEMBER 2018.

Drawing No. 5936/19/1/E (PROPOSED EXTENSION & INTERNAL ALTERATIONS), dated APR 19.

Drawing No. 5936/19/2/A (PROPOSED INTERNAL ALTERATIONS), dated APR 19.

REF. HP 06/16 (CRITTALL HOMELIGHT PLUS WINDOW FRAME PROFILES).

 

(Councillor Mier declared a personal interest in this matter in so far as he had previously instructed the Agent in a personal capacity and in accordance with the Members’ Code of Conduct remained in the room during the consideration thereof).

 

Publication date: 20/11/2019

Date of decision: 14/11/2019

Decided at meeting: 14/11/2019 - Planning Committee

Accompanying Documents: